Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Williams v. State

Williams v. State

778 So. 2d 1065, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2145, 2001 WL 195025
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 710 So. 2d 24 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 2001·No. No. 4D00-4559·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accept the assistant attorney general’s commendable concession that the trial court should have considered appellant’s facially meritorious motion, albeit filed under Rule 8.800, as one filed under Rule 3.850, and considered the merits. See Hart v. State, 773 So.2d 605 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion and Hart.

STONE, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 778 So. 2d 1065, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2145, 2001 WL 195025 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

778 So. 2d 1065 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hart v. State
773 So. 2d 605 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)