Williams v. State
769 So. 2d 479, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13300, 2000 WL 1513754
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 13, 2000·No. No. 5D00-2497·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of Stanley Williams’ motion to correct sentence pursuant to Rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, because the alleged sentencing error is not readily ascertainable from the face of the record. See Holland v. State, 672 So.2d 566 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 678 So.2d 338 (Fla.1996).
Our affirmance is without prejudice, thereby allowing Williams to file a legally sufficient Rule 3.850 motion if he can do so in a timely manner.
AFFIRMED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 769 So. 2d 479, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13300, 2000 WL 1513754 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
769 So. 2d 479 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gaynor v. State
831 So. 2d 1246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)