Williams v. State

726 So. 2d 860, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2195, 1999 WL 94687
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 673 So. 2d 974
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 1999·No. No. 98-2154·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Patrick Williams appeals his departure sentence. We affirm.

Mr. Williams entered a negotiated plea agreement and was released pending sentencing subject to Quarberman1 conditions. He was duly advised by the trial court that if he failed to appear for sentencing the court would not be bound by the sentencing terms provided in the plea agreement. On the day of sentencing Mr. Williams failed to appear. A warrant was issued and he was subsequently arrested. When he was brought to the court for sentencing Mr. Williams failed to submit any evidence indicating that his failure to appear was excusable. Accordingly, the trial court was authorized to impose a departure sentence. Cf. Walker v. State, 578 So.2d 514 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

SENTENCE AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP, THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 726 So. 2d 860, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2195, 1999 WL 94687 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

726 So. 2d 860 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. State
578 So. 2d 514 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Quarterman v. State
527 So. 2d 1380 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)