Williams v. State
580 So. 2d 624, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1743, 1991 WL 25347
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 1, 1991·No. No. 90-2679·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
This is an appeal from the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion to vacate and set aside an illegal sentence. Appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief is insufficient, in that it is not under oath as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and it fails to include the information required by subsections (b), (c), and (d) of the rule.
Accordingly, we affirm the denial of appellant’s motion, but such denial is without prejudice to the filing of a proper motion in accordance with the requirements of the rule.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 580 So. 2d 624, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1743, 1991 WL 25347 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
580 So. 2d 624 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thomas v. State
686 So. 2d 699 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Black v. State
610 So. 2d 89 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)