Williams v. State

569 So. 2d 1336, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8553, 1990 WL 175067
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 525 So. 2d 458
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 9, 1990·No. No. 89-2703·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ronnie Jerome Williams appeals his judgment and sentence for possession of cocaine, sale of cocaine, and conspiracy to sell cocaine, and raises three issues on appeal: (1) Whether the trial court erred in allowing the introduction of similar-fact evidence; (2) whether the evidence supports a conviction for conspiracy to sell cocaine; (3) whether the appellant can legally be convicted and sentenced for both possession and sale of cocaine arising from the same transaction.

We affirm issues 1 and 2 without comment. We affirm issue 3 in accord with our decision in St. Fabre v. State, 548 So.2d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), acknowledging conflict with V.A.A. v. State, 561 So.2d 314 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED.

WIGGINTON, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 569 So. 2d 1336, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8553, 1990 WL 175067 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

569 So. 2d 1336 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

St. Fabre v. State
548 So. 2d 797 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
V.A.A. v. State
561 So. 2d 314 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)