Williams v. State

504 So. 2d 472, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 783
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 454 So. 2d 737
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 17, 1987·No. No. 87-41·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

On January 20, 1987, we reversed the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s Rule 3.850 motion because of the trial court’s failure to attach such portions of the record to make it affirmatively appear that the grounds asserted in the motion were without merit. The State has moved for a rehearing of our decision and has advised us that the Clerk of the Circuit Court had failed to forward to this court the trial court’s detailed and well-reasoned order denying the defendant relief, to which exhibits were appended. The State has simultaneously moved to supplement the record on appeal to incorporate this order.

We grant the State’s motion to supplement and its motion for rehearing. It appears from the record as now supplemented that the trial court was eminently correct in denying the defendant’s Rule 3.850 motion. We thus vacate our opinion of January 20, 1987, and affirm the order under review.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 504 So. 2d 472, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 783 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

504 So. 2d 472 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.