Williams v. State

340 So. 2d 1191, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16120
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 3, 1976·No. No. 75-895·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

In light of the Supreme Court of Florida’s recent decisions in Shannon v. State, 335 So.2d 5 (Fla.1976); Bennett v. State, 316 So.2d 41 (Fla.1975), and this court’s decisions in Martin v. State, 334 So.2d 841 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976), and Bostic v. State, 332 So.2d 349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976), the testimony elicited during direct examination by the State reflecting the defendant’s silence after his arrest and Miranda warnings constituted fundamental reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence of conviction are reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

MAGER, C. J., and DOWNEY, J., concur. ALDERMAN, J., dissents, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 340 So. 2d 1191, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16120 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

340 So. 2d 1191 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pinkney v. State
351 So. 2d 1047 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Sylvester v. State
341 So. 2d 203 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)