Williams v. State
340 So. 2d 523, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16064
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 294 So. 2d 37 →
Opinion
Defendant Alfred Williams appeals from an order of revocation of probation upon the basis that the evidence was insufficient to show that he had violated the terms of his probation. The record reveals substantial evidence sufficient to sustain the holding of the trial court, and the revocation of probation is thereupon affirmed. See the rule in Ivey v. State, 308 So.2d 565 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 340 So. 2d 523, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16064 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).
340 So. 2d 523 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ivey v. State
308 So. 2d 565 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)