Williams v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.
This text of 250 A.2d 155 (Williams v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ROBERT E. WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
*404 Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.
Mr. Charles L. Morgan argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Ralph W. Campbell argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Campbell, Mangini, Foley, Lee and Murphy, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment entered herein is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Salvest in the Law Division, 99 N.J. Super. 377 (1968).
Additionally, the insurance policy issued by defendant under "Definitions" provides: "Damages wherever used with respect to coverage A [Bodily Injury Liability] includes damages for care and loss of service," (Emphasis added). This definition clearly establishes that a husband's per quod claim is included in the $25,000 policy limitation "for all damages arising out of bodily injury sustained by one person in any one accident * * *."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 A.2d 155, 104 N.J. Super. 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-farm-mutual-auto-ins-co-njsuperctappdiv-1969.