Williams v. State Department of Revenue

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Williams v. State Department of Revenue

118 So. 3d 321, 2013 WL 3942924, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12082

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 1, 2013

DocketNo. 1D13-2961

StatusPublished

This text of 118 So. 3d 321 (Williams v. State Department of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. State Department of Revenue, 118 So. 3d 321, 2013 WL 3942924, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12082 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order of June 25, 2013, the Court has determined that the Order on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is not a final order because it fails to conclude the judicial labor in the case. We decline appellant’s suggestion that we undertake certiorari review, concluding that appellant has failed to demonstrate that the order on appeal will result in injury which cannot be adequately remedied on appeal following final judgment. Belair v. Drew, 770 So.2d 1164, 1166 (Fla.2000). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

VAN NORTWICK, CLARK, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order of June 25, 2013, the Court has determined that the Order on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is not a final order because it fails to conclude the judicial labor in the case. We decline appellant’s suggestion that we undertake certiorari review, concluding that appellant has failed to demonstrate that the order on appeal will result in injury which cannot be adequately remedied on appeal following final judgment. Belair v. Drew, 770 So.2d 1164, 1166 (Fla.2000). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

VAN NORTWICK, CLARK, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 So. 3d 321, 2013 WL 3942924, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-department-of-revenue-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack