Williams v. State
This text of Williams v. State (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
JOSEPH D. WILLIAMS, § § Defendant Below, § No. 29, 2018 Appellant, § § v. § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Cr. ID No. 9809018249 (N) Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: March 6, 2018 Decided: May 7, 2018
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.
ORDER
The Court has considered carefully the opening brief, the motion to affirm, and
the record on appeal. We conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the
basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its well-reasoned decision
dated December 21, 2017. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that Williams’
second motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred and did not satisfy the
pleading requirements of Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(i)(5) and (d)(2).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court
is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Williams v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-del-2018.