Williams v. State, Commission on Ethics
23 So. 3d 235, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19603, 2009 WL 4784505
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Rosenzweig v. Dep’t. of Transp., 979 So.2d 1050, 1056 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (holding that a claim of error, even in the administrative context, cannot be raised for the first time on appeal); Arza v. Fla. Elections Convm’n, 907 So.2d 604, 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (holding that appellant could not challenge agency decision on appeal, where no challenge had been made below).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, Commission on Ethics, 23 So. 3d 235, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19603, 2009 WL 4784505 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
23 So. 3d 235 (Williams v. State, Commission on Ethics) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Arza v. FLORIDA ELECTIONS COM'N.
907 So. 2d 604 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Rosenzweig v. Department of Transp.
979 So. 2d 1050 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)