Williams v. State

748 S.W.2d 355, 24 Ark. App. 118, 1988 Ark. App. LEXIS 211
Court of Appeals of Arkansas·Decided May 11, 1988·No. CA CR 87-209·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Beth Gladden Coulson, Judge.

Appellant, Garry Ray Williams, brings this appeal from his conviction for rape. Appellant waived his right to a jury trial and was tried before a circuit judge, sitting without a jury. On appeal, appellant argues that his conviction for rape is not supported by sufficient evidence. We do not reach the merits of that argument because it is raised for the first time on appeal.

This court does not consider matters which were not raised before the trial court. Dillard v. State, 20 Ark. App. 35, 723 S.W.2d 373 (1987). This is a settled rule. Accordingly, we do not consider appellant’s argument, and the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Corbin, C.J., and Mayfield, J., agree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 748 S.W.2d 355, 24 Ark. App. 118, 1988 Ark. App. LEXIS 211 (Ark. Ct. App. 1988).

748 S.W.2d 355 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
783 S.W.2d 72 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1990)
Williams v. State
766 S.W.2d 931 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1989)