Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Williams v. State

166 S.W.3d 564, 357 Ark. 367, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 296

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMay 6, 2004

DocketCR 04-413

StatusPublished

This text of 166 S.W.3d 564 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. State, 166 S.W.3d 564, 357 Ark. 367, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 296 (Ark. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant James Edward Williams, by and riam. attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Robert N. Jeffrey, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant James Edward Williams, by and riam. attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Robert N. Jeffrey, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 S.W.3d 564, 357 Ark. 367, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-ark-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack