Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Williams v. State

440 P.3d 399

CourtCourt of Appeals of Alaska

DecidedApril 22, 2019

DocketCourt of Appeals No. A-12183

StatusPublished

This text of 440 P.3d 399 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Alaska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. State, 440 P.3d 399 (Ala. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

In March 2018, this Court issued our decision in this case: Williams v. State, 418 P.3d 870 (Alaska App. 2018). As part of our decision, we construed - and interpreted the relationship between - two provisions of Alaska's felony sentencing statutes: AS 12.55.145(a)(1) and (a)(4). See Williams, 418 P.3d at 872-76.

The State sought rehearing of that portion of our decision. We granted the State's petition for rehearing, and we directed the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing this question of statutory interpretation.

We have now considered the parties' supplemental briefs, and we remain convinced that our resolution of this issue in Williams is correct. Accordingly, we RE-AFFIRM the *400interpretation of AS 12.55.145(a)(1) and (a)(4) that we adopted in Williams.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In March 2018, this Court issued our decision in this case: Williams v. State, 418 P.3d 870 (Alaska App. 2018). As part of our decision, we construed - and interpreted the relationship between - two provisions of Alaska's felony sentencing statutes: AS 12.55.145(a)(1) and (a)(4). See Williams, 418 P.3d at 872-76.

The State sought rehearing of that portion of our decision. We granted the State's petition for rehearing, and we directed the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing this question of statutory interpretation.

We have now considered the parties' supplemental briefs, and we remain convinced that our resolution of this issue in Williams is correct. Accordingly, we RE-AFFIRM the *400interpretation of AS 12.55.145(a)(1) and (a)(4) that we adopted in Williams.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

440 P.3d 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-alaskactapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack