Williams v. State
152 So. 927, 26 Ala. App. 702
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ala. App. 206 →
Opinion
This cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury, and, while there are some technical errors appearing in the record, the rulings did not probably injuriously affect the defendant’s rights, and none of these errors is of such nature as would justify a reversal.
Giving to the findings of the court the presumption to which they are entitled, we cannot say that the judgment is error, and, finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 152 So. 927, 26 Ala. App. 702 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).
152 So. 927 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.