Williams v. State
Opinion
The appellant, Laterrance Jerome Williams, appeals from his conviction for trafficking in a controlled substance, a violation of §
In this appeal, the appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence based upon an unlawful search and seizure. Because the search warrant and the accompanying affidavit were not made a part of the record, we cannot consider the appellant's argument. See Crenshaw v. State,
Because the trial court inadvertently failed to impose the mandatory fines under §
REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.*
LONG, P.J., and COBB, BASCHAB, and FRY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
794 So. 2d 441 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.