Home/Supreme Court of Alabama/Williams v. State

Williams v. State

109 Ala. 64
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 15, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 109 Ala. 64 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. State, 109 Ala. 64 (Ala. 1895).

Opinion

COLEMAN, J.

The exceptions reserved to the ruling of the court, in allowing the state to challenge the two jurors for cause, is without merit. Finch v. The State, 81 Ala. 41; Cr. Code, § 4331.

The voir dire examination of the witness Annie Bowls showed that she was competent to testify, and the court ruled correctly in so holding. Grimes v. State, 17 So. Rep. 189. The exception to the competency of the witness is the only one insisted upon in brief of counsel.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment of the tidal court must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chavers v. State
58 So. 3d 829 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2009)
Finley v. State
295 So. 2d 428 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1974)
McHenry v. State
181 So. 2d 98 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1965)
Biggs v. State
103 So. 706 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Crenshaw v. State
87 So. 328 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)
Wise v. State
66 So. 128 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1914)
Henderson v. State
65 So. 721 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)
Bone v. State
62 So. 455 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 Ala. 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-ala-1895.