Williams v. Stack

366 So. 2d 872, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14008
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 1979·No. No. 78-1508·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a default. The motion to set aside the default did not allege the existence of a meritorious defense, and no proof was ever submitted, other than representations of counsel, concerning any legal excuse for the failure to respond to the complaint. As such the motion and proof were insufficient to justify setting aside the default. Clark v. Roberto's, Inc., 320 So.2d 870 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Winter Park Arms, Inc. v. Ak-[873] erman, 199 So.2d 107 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); Thomason v. Jernigan, 146 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962). Accordingly, the order is reversed.

DOWNEY, C. J., and ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Stack, 366 So. 2d 872, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14008 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

366 So. 2d 872 (Williams v. Stack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arranco Shoes By Carmen, Inc. v. Calzados Milady, S.L.
422 So. 2d 341 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Vanguard Group, Inc. v. Vanguard Security, Inc.
409 So. 2d 1219 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
TIE COMMUNICATIONS v. Toyota Motors
391 So. 2d 697 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)