Williams v. Stack

366 So. 2d 872, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14008
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 31, 1979
DocketNo. 78-1508
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 366 So. 2d 872 (Williams v. Stack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Stack, 366 So. 2d 872, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14008 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a default. The motion to set aside the default did not allege the existence of a meritorious defense, and no proof was ever submitted, other than representations of counsel, concerning any legal excuse for the failure to respond to the complaint. As such the motion and proof were insufficient to justify setting aside the default. Clark v. Roberto's, Inc., 320 So.2d 870 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Winter Park Arms, Inc. v. Ak-[873]*873erman, 199 So.2d 107 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); Thomason v. Jernigan, 146 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962). Accordingly, the order is reversed.

DOWNEY, C. J., and ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arranco Shoes By Carmen, Inc. v. Calzados Milady, S.L.
422 So. 2d 341 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Vanguard Group, Inc. v. Vanguard Security, Inc.
409 So. 2d 1219 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
TIE COMMUNICATIONS v. Toyota Motors
391 So. 2d 697 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
366 So. 2d 872, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-stack-fladistctapp-1979.