Williams v. Stack

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Williams v. Stack

269 So. 2d 771, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5946

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 7, 1972·No. No. 72-353·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s original direct appeal from a judgment and sentence imposed upon [772] conviction of the unlawful sale of LSD was frustrated by an untimely filed notice of appeal by court appointed counsel.

We grant petitioner a belated review of the judgment and sentence equivalent to a direct appeal by means of this habeas corpus proceeding. Henninger v. State, 230 So.2d 149 (Fla.1970).

We dispense with oral argument pursuant to F.A.R. 3.10(e), 32 F.S.A. We have examined the briefs and record, and conclude that petitioner has failed to demonstrate reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is affirmed and habeas corpus denied.

Habeas corpus denied.

REED, C. J., and CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s original direct appeal from a judgment and sentence imposed upon [772] conviction of the unlawful sale of LSD was frustrated by an untimely filed notice of appeal by court appointed counsel.

We grant petitioner a belated review of the judgment and sentence equivalent to a direct appeal by means of this habeas corpus proceeding. Henninger v. State, 230 So.2d 149 (Fla.1970).

We dispense with oral argument pursuant to F.A.R. 3.10(e), 32 F.S.A. We have examined the briefs and record, and conclude that petitioner has failed to demonstrate reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is affirmed and habeas corpus denied.

Habeas corpus denied.

REED, C. J., and CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Williams v. Stack, 269 So. 2d 771, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5946 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

269 So. 2d 771 (Williams v. Stack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related