Williams v. Speer

104 S.E. 905, 150 Ga. 439, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 195
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 16, 1920
DocketNo. 1742
StatusPublished

This text of 104 S.E. 905 (Williams v. Speer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Speer, 104 S.E. 905, 150 Ga. 439, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 195 (Ga. 1920).

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

Under the evidence and pleadings in this case the court did not err in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed,.

All the Justices coneur. W. W. Bennett, for plaintiffs,

cited 23 Cyc. 1256-1263; Browning v. Guest, 147 Ga. 400, and cit.

Padgett & Watson, for defendants,

cited Civil Code, §§ 4528, 4519-4522, 6024; Austin v. Southern Home &c. Asso., 122 Ga. 439; Rodgers v. Bell, 53 Ga. 94, 97; Stokes v. Morrow, 54 Ga. 598; 15 Cyc. 186.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodgers v. Bell
53 Ga. 94 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1874)
Austin v. Southern Home Building & Loan Ass'n
50 S.E. 382 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Browning v. Guest
94 S.E. 234 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 S.E. 905, 150 Ga. 439, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-speer-ga-1920.