Williams v. Speer

104 S.E. 905, 150 Ga. 439, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 195
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 16, 1920·No. No. 1742·Published

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

Under the evidence and pleadings in this case the court did not err in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed,.

All the Justices coneur. W. W. Bennett, for plaintiffs,

cited 23 Cyc. 1256-1263; Browning v. Guest, 147 Ga. 400, and cit.

Padgett & Watson, for defendants,

cited Civil Code, §§ 4528, 4519-4522, 6024; Austin v. Southern Home &c. Asso., 122 Ga. 439; Rodgers v. Bell, 53 Ga. 94, 97; Stokes v. Morrow, 54 Ga. 598; 15 Cyc. 186.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Speer, 104 S.E. 905, 150 Ga. 439, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 195 (Ga. 1920).

104 S.E. 905 (Williams v. Speer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodgers v. Bell
53 Ga. 94 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1874)
Austin v. Southern Home Building & Loan Ass'n
50 S.E. 382 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Browning v. Guest
94 S.E. 234 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)