Williams v. Social Security Administration

District Court, D. New Mexico·Decided March 1, 2021·No. 2:19-cv-00905·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

AMANDA WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

vs. No. 2:19-CV-00905-KRS

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

ORDER

Plaintiff’s Stipulated Motion for Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) is GRANTED. Defendant shall pay Plaintiff $4,750.00 in attorney fees. Payment of this amount shall constitute a complete release from and bar to any and all claims Plaintiff may have relating to EAJA fees in connection with this action. However, the EAJA award is without prejudice to Plaintiff’s attorney’s right to seek attorney fees pursuant to Social Security Act § 206(b), 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(c)(1)(2006). Under Astrue v. Ratiff, 130 S.Ct 2521, 2528-29 (2010), EAJA fees awarded by this Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B)(2006)). This Court therefore orders the EAJA fees to be paid to Plaintiff. If, after receiving the Court’s EAJA fee order, the Commissioner (1) determines the Plaintiff has properly assigned her right to EAJA fees to her attorney; (2) determines that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program; and (3) agrees to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, then the EAJA fees will be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney. However, if there is a debt owed under the Treasury Offset Program, the Commissioner cannot agree to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check made out to Plaintiff but delivered to Plaintiffs attorney.

THE HONORABLE KEVIN R. SWEAZEA United States Magistrate Judge

Respectfully Submitted:

/s/ Jaame F. Rubin JAIME F. RUBIN, Esq. Attorney for Amandia Williams P.O. Drawer 151 Truth or Consequences, NM 87901 575.894.3031 Fax: 575.894.3282 jrubin@zianet.com Approved by:

Approved via e-mail February 23, 2021 ALLAN D. BERGER Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169 Denver, CO 80294-4003 (303) 844-2149 allan.berger@ssa.gov

Page 2 of 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Social Security Administration, (D.N.M. 2021).

Williams v. Social Security Administration (Williams v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)