Williams v. Social Security Administration
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
EARL WILLIAMS PLAINTIFF
v. NO. 3:22-cv-00221-PSH
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of DEFENDANT the Social Security Administration
ORDER
The Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) has filed the pending unopposed motion to remand for further administrative proceedings pursuant to “sentence four” of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). See Docket Entry 12. For good cause shown, the motion is granted. This case is remanded in accordance with the terms outlined by the Commissioner. The remand in this case is a “sentence four” remand. See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). The dismissal of this case is without prejudice to plaintiff Earl Williams’ subsequent filing of a motion for attorney’s fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. A separate judgment will be entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of January, 2023.
UNITED STATES fe JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Social Security Administration (Williams v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.