Williams v. Social Security Administration

District Court, E.D. Arkansas·Decided November 13, 2019·No. 3:19-cv-00156·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION

TAUSHA LYLES WILLIAMS PLAINTIFF

VS. No. 3:19-cv-00156 PSH

ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION DEFENDANT

ORDER

Now before the Court is the plaintiff Tausha Lyles Willams’ (“Williams”) motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Defendant Andrew Saul (“Saul”) does not oppose the motion. The Court grants the motion and approves an EAJA award in the amount of $2,899.73 (which includes $29.73 in expenses). There is nothing unreasonable about the hours of work performed or the hourly rate requested. Because the award belongs to Williams, and not her attorney, as set forth in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), the Department of Treasury shall issue payment of this award by check made payable to Williams, in care of her attorney, Nicholas L. Coleman, and shall mail the check to Mr. Coleman at his Cave Springs, Arkansas, address. The motion for fees (docket entry no. 20) is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED this 12" day of November, 2019.

< UNITED STATES MAGIS 3 RATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Social Security Administration, (E.D. Ark. 2019).

Williams v. Social Security Administration (Williams v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)