Williams v. Social Security Administration
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION
TAUSHA LYLES WILLIAMS PLAINTIFF
VS. No. 3:19-cv-00156 PSH
ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION DEFENDANT
ORDER
Now before the Court is the plaintiff Tausha Lyles Willams’ (“Williams”) motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Defendant Andrew Saul (“Saul”) does not oppose the motion. The Court grants the motion and approves an EAJA award in the amount of $2,899.73 (which includes $29.73 in expenses). There is nothing unreasonable about the hours of work performed or the hourly rate requested. Because the award belongs to Williams, and not her attorney, as set forth in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), the Department of Treasury shall issue payment of this award by check made payable to Williams, in care of her attorney, Nicholas L. Coleman, and shall mail the check to Mr. Coleman at his Cave Springs, Arkansas, address. The motion for fees (docket entry no. 20) is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED this 12" day of November, 2019.
< UNITED STATES MAGIS 3 RATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Social Security Administration (Williams v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.