Williams v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Williams v. Smith

6 Cal. 91

California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1856·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt.

Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

A mandamus will not lie against a sheriff to compel him to make a [92] deed of land to a purchaser at execution sale who refuses to pay the purchase money for the reason that he is the oldest judgment and execution creditor and entitled to the money; especially when there is an unsettled contest as to the question of lien.

The principle involved here was settled in the case of The People ex rel. Kohler v. Hays, decided at the January Term, 1855, (5 Cal. R.)

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt.

Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

A mandamus will not lie against a sheriff to compel him to make a [92] deed of land to a purchaser at execution sale who refuses to pay the purchase money for the reason that he is the oldest judgment and execution creditor and entitled to the money; especially when there is an unsettled contest as to the question of lien.

The principle involved here was settled in the case of The People ex rel. Kohler v. Hays, decided at the January Term, 1855, (5 Cal. R.)

Judgment reversed.

Williams v. Smith, 6 Cal. 91 (Cal. 1856).

Pincite

6 Cal. 91 (Williams v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related