Williams v. Smith

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. Smith

509 F. App'x 272

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 13, 2013

DocketNo. 12-7627

StatusPublished

This text of 509 F. App'x 272 (Williams v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Smith, 509 F. App'x 272 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stanley Lorenzo Williams appeals the district court’s text order denying his Motion for Preparation of the State Court Stenographic Transcript at State Expense and Request for an Expedited Ruling on the Matter Given the Pending Appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny [273]*273leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, deny Williams’ motion to expand the record, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stanley Lorenzo Williams appeals the district court’s text order denying his Motion for Preparation of the State Court Stenographic Transcript at State Expense and Request for an Expedited Ruling on the Matter Given the Pending Appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny [273]*273leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, deny Williams’ motion to expand the record, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

509 F. App'x 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-smith-ca4-2013.