Williams v. Smith

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. Smith

509 F. App'x 272

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 13, 2013·No. No. 12-7627·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stanley Lorenzo Williams appeals the district court’s text order denying his Motion for Preparation of the State Court Stenographic Transcript at State Expense and Request for an Expedited Ruling on the Matter Given the Pending Appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny [273] leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, deny Williams’ motion to expand the record, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stanley Lorenzo Williams appeals the district court’s text order denying his Motion for Preparation of the State Court Stenographic Transcript at State Expense and Request for an Expedited Ruling on the Matter Given the Pending Appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny [273] leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, deny Williams’ motion to expand the record, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Williams v. Smith, 509 F. App'x 272 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

509 F. App'x 272 (Williams v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.