Williams v. Slater

52 S.E.2d 424, 214 S.C. 317, 1949 S.C. LEXIS 36
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 7, 1949
Docket16191
StatusPublished

This text of 52 S.E.2d 424 (Williams v. Slater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Slater, 52 S.E.2d 424, 214 S.C. 317, 1949 S.C. LEXIS 36 (S.C. 1949).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is an áttack upon the soundness of two former decisions of this Court, namely, United States Rubber Co. v. McManus, 211 S. C. 342, 45 S. E. (2d) 335, and Hardee v. Lynch, 212 S. C. 6, 46 S. E. (2d) 179, which it is sought to overrule. They construed and applied Act No. 516 of 1946, 44 Stat. at Large, p. 1436, in such manner as to thwart the purpose of appellant’s proceeding, commenced in December *319 1947, which is for leave to bring an action looking to'the collection from debtor’s estate of a money judgment over twenty years old, revived in 1936. The lower court refused relief upon the authority of the cited decisions..

Upon careful review of them in the light of appellant’s earnest argument, we are satisfied that they were correctly decided and see no necessity to attempt tó add to the reasoning and authorities which the opinions contain. Hence, appellant’s exceptions in this case must be overruled.

Affirmed.

Baker, C. J., and FishburnE, Stukes, Tayror, and OxNER, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hardee v. Lynch
46 S.E.2d 179 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1948)
United States Rubber Co. v. McManus
45 S.E.2d 335 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 S.E.2d 424, 214 S.C. 317, 1949 S.C. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-slater-sc-1949.