Williams v. Skipwith

34 Ark. 529
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 15, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 34 Ark. 529 (Williams v. Skipwith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Skipwith, 34 Ark. 529 (Ark. 1879).

Opinion

Harrison, J.

E. H. Skipwith sued the Memphis and Little Rock Railroad company, before a justice of the-peace, on an account for $250.

The suit was commenced on the seventeenth day of March, 1873, and the summons was served the same day.

No affidavit, nor bond, as required in suits by attachment, was filed, nor order of attachment issued; but the defendant, on the eighteenth day of the same month, filed with the justice, and which was approved by him, the bond of B. D. Williams, to the plaintiff, in the sum of $500, conditioned that the defendant would perform the judgment that should be rendered in the case.

Upon the trial, the justice foundin favor of the defendant; and the plaintiff took an appeal to the circuit court.

The case was tried in the circuit court, at the May term, 1876, by the court without a jury, which found for the plaintiff the sum claimed in his account, $250, and rendered judgment therefor against the defendant, and also, without any notice to him, against Williams.

An execution on the judgment was issued on the second day of October, 1876, to Jefferson county, and Williams gave a stay bond. After the return of the execution, he applied for, and obtained, an appeal to this comí.

There was no attachment against the defendant’s property. The bond filed with the justice was unauthorized by law, and answered no purpose in the suit.

It could, therefore, give the circuit court no jurisdiction as to the appellant, and the judgment against him was coram, non judice, and void.

There being no judgment against him, the execution and stay bond were also void.

The judgment of the circuit court against the appellant is, therefore, reversed, and, together with the subsequent proceedings, set aside and held for naught.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Spradlin
206 S.W. 327 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1918)
Emerson v. Hopper
127 S.W. 467 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1910)
Walker v. Fetzer
34 S.W. 536 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1896)
Fox v. Mackenzie
47 N.W. 386 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Ark. 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-skipwith-ark-1879.