Williams v. Sims

16 S.W. 786, 4 Willson 215
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 25, 1890
DocketNo. 6706
StatusPublished

This text of 16 S.W. 786 (Williams v. Sims) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Sims, 16 S.W. 786, 4 Willson 215 (Tex. Ct. App. 1890).

Opinion

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 151. Appeal from justice's to county court; trial de novo on; without such trial court of appeals will entertain jurisdiction, when. On August 26, 1889, appellee recovered judgment in justice’s court against appellant for $28.20 and costs. On September 3, 1889, less than ten days after the rendition of said judgment, appellant made a motion for a new trial, which on the same day was overruled. On the 13th day of September, 1889, the said date being within ten days after the overruling of the motion for new trial, appellant filed an appeal bond. Said bond is in proper form, contains the statutory conditions, describes correctly the judgment appealed from by stating the style and number of the suit, the justice who rendered it, the date of its rendition, the amount for which it was rendered, and the parties in whose favor it was rendered, and against whom it was rendered. Upon the motion of the appellee, made in the county court, the appeal was dismissed upon the ground that the appeal bond was not filed in time, and that it misdescribed the judgment appealed from. It was error to dismiss the appeal. The appeal bond was filed in time. [3 Civil Cas. Ct. App., § 105.] It did not misdescribe the judgment appealed from, but in all essential particulars described it correctly, and with sufficient certainty to identify it. This court will entertain jurisdiction of an appeal where there has not been a trial de novo in the county court, and the amount in controversy or the judg[216]*216ment of the justice’s court exceeds $20. [Pevito v. Rodgers, 52 Tex. 581.] Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for trial de novo.

June 25, 1890.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pevito v. Rodgers
52 Tex. 581 (Texas Supreme Court, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 S.W. 786, 4 Willson 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-sims-texapp-1890.