Williams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided April 20, 2020·No. 16-24·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-24V (not to be published)

***************************** CAROL WILLIAMS, * * Petitioner, * Filed: February 21, 2020 * v. * Decision by Stipulation; Damages; * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; * Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”). SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * *****************************

John R. Howie, Jr., Howie Law, PC, Dallas, Tx., for Petitioner.

Glenn A. MacLeod, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

On February 13, 2017, Petitioner Carol Williams (“Petitioner”) filed a petition seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Vaccine Program”).2 Pet., ECF No. 1. Petitioner alleges that she developed Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on January 17, 2013. See Stipulation ¶ 2, 4, dated February 21, 2020 (ECF No. 69); see also Petition.

Respondent denies “that the flu vaccine caused Petitioner to suffer GBS, or any other

1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “not to be published,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims’ website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 (2012). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. As provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the Decision in its present form will be available. Id. 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. ' 300aa- 10-' 300aa-34 (West 1991 & Supp. 2002). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. ' 300aa. injury, and further denies that her current disabilities are a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.” See Stipulation ¶ 6. Nonetheless, both parties, while maintaining their above-stated positions, agreed in a stipulation filed February 21, 2020 that the issues before them can be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding Petitioner compensation. Id. at ¶ 7.

I have reviewed the file, and based upon that review, I conclude that the parties’ stipulation is reasonable. I therefore adopt it as my decision in awarding damages on the terms set forth therein.

The parties have stipulated that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

1. Lump Sum

A lump sum of $230,255.30, which represents compensation for first year life care expenses ($35,255.30), pain and suffering ($165,000.00), and past unreimbursable expenses ($30,000), In the form of a check payable to petitioner. Stip. ¶ 8.

2. Annuity

The remainder of damages shall be paid in the form of an annuity contract, which shall be purchased as soon as practicable after entry of judgment. Accordingly, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(f)(4), I order respondent to purchase, and take ownership of, an annuity contract,3 as described below:

Each Life Insurance Company must meet the following criteria:

1. Have a minimum of $250,000,000 of capital and surplus, exclusive of any mandatory security valuation reserve; and

2. have one of the following ratings from two of the following rating organizations: a) A.M. Best Company: A++, A+, A+g, A+p, A+r, or A+s; b) Moody’s Investor Service Claims Paying Rating: Aa3, Aa2, Aa1, or Aaa; c) Standard and Poor’s Corporation Insurer Claims-Paying Ability Rating: AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA; d) Fitch Credit Rating Company, Insurance Company Claims-Paying Ability Rating: AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA.

The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall purchase an annuity contract from the Life Insurance Company for the benefit of Petitioner, pursuant to which the Life Insurance Company will agree to make payments periodically to Petitioner as described in paragraph 10 of the attached Stipulation.

3 To satisfy the conditions set forth herein, in respondent’s discretion, respondent may purchase one or more annuity contracts from one or more life insurance companies. 2 I approve a Vaccine Program award in the requested amount set forth above to be made to Petitioner. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment herewith.4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Katherine E. Oler Katherine E. Oler Special Master

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by jointly filing notice renouncing their right to seek review.

3 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) CAROL WILLIAMS, ) ) Petitioner, ) V. ) ) No. 16-24V SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) Special Master AND HUMAN SERVICES ) Katherine E. Oler ) Respondent. )

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

l . Carol Williams, petitioner, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (the ..Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt

of an influenza ("flu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the

"Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. Petitioner received her flu immunization on or about January 17, 2013.

3. The vaccination was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she suffered Ouillain-Barre Syndrome ("OBS") as a result of

receiving the flu vaccine, and further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of this

condition for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on her behalf as a result of her condition.

6. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to suffer OBS, or any other

injury, and further denies that her current disabilities are a sequela of a vaccine-related injury. 7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue ·

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2020).

Williams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Williams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(f)(4)
§ 300aa-2l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a