Williams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 13-744V Filed: December 29, 2014 Not for Publication
************************************* JACKIE ALLEN WILLIAMS, * * Petitioner, * Damages decision based on stipulation; * influenza (flu) vaccine; Guillain-Barré v. * Syndrome (GBS) * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * ************************************* Diana Stadelnikas Sedar, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner. Alexis B. Babcock, Washington, DC, for respondent.
MILLMAN, Special Master
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
On December 29, 2014, the parties filed the attached stipulation in which they agreed to settle this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) that was caused by his March 16, 2011 receipt of influenza vaccine. Petitioner further alleges that he suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Respondent denies that petitioner’s GBS was caused-in-fact by his influenza vaccination and further denies that the vaccine caused any other injury or his current condition. Nonetheless, the parties agreed to resolve this matter informally.
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master's action in this case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to delete such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall delete such material from public access. The undersigned finds the terms of the stipulation to be reasonable. The court hereby adopts the parties’ said stipulation, attached hereto, and awards compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the stipulation, the court awards:
a. a lump sum of $44,931.14, representing compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). The award shall be in the form of a check for $44,931.14 payable to petitioner;
b. a lump sum of $68.68, representing compensation for satisfaction of the State of Idaho Medicaid lien. The award shall be in the form of a check for $68.68 payable jointly to petitioner and
HMS Recovery Unit P.O. Box 2894 Boise, Idaho 83701-5875 ATTN: Summer Edwards
Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to the State of Idaho; and
c. a lump sum of $25,907.00, representing reimbursement for a medical expense incurred by petitioner as a result of his GBS. The award shall be in the form of a check for $25,907.00, made payable jointly to petitioner and Community Hospital of Anaconda. Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to Community Hospital of Anaconda.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 29, 2014 s/ Laura D. Millman Laura D. Millman Special Master
2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Williams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.