Home/Supreme Court/Williams v. Scudder

Williams v. Scudder

258 U.S. 607, 42 S. Ct. 316, 66 L. Ed. 787, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2314
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 27, 1922
DocketNo. 352
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 258 U.S. 607 (Williams v. Scudder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Scudder, 258 U.S. 607, 42 S. Ct. 316, 66 L. Ed. 787, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2314 (1922).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195. (2) Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468 470; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. [608]*608Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 303; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271.

Mr. Smith W. Bennett for plaintiffs in error. Mr. John G. Price and Mr. Roy Martin for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meeker v. Scudder
17 Ohio App. 210 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
258 U.S. 607, 42 S. Ct. 316, 66 L. Ed. 787, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-scudder-scotus-1922.