Williams v. Scott
This text of 30 Ala. 241 (Williams v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where the plaintiff, in an action of detinue, gives the bonds contemplated in the statute, and, by virtue thereof obtains possession of the property, and surrenders the possession back to the defendant upon the subsequent dismissal of the suit, he is not responsible, under a complaint for wrongfully taking the property, for the defendant’s attorney’s fee in the detinue suit, nor for the hire of the property during its detention under the detinue bonds, nor for the trouble and loss of time of the defendant in the detinue suit in attending to its defense. It follows that the plaintiff in this case had no right to recover, under the complaint, upon the facts proved; and the judgment of the court below must be reversed, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 Ala. 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-scott-ala-1857.