Williams v. . Schimmerhorn

53 N.C. 104
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 5, 1860
StatusPublished

This text of 53 N.C. 104 (Williams v. . Schimmerhorn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. . Schimmerhorn, 53 N.C. 104 (N.C. 1860).

Opinion

Pearson, C. J.

There is no error; the proceedings of every 'court are said to be in fieri, until the term expires ; that is, its actions are not considered, in law, as completed or done, but as being held in suspense, under consideration, until the end of the term, consequently, the County Court had power, in our case, to set aside the judgment. Its exercise was a mere matter -of discretion, and the plaintiff had no more ground for an appeal, than he would have had from an order of the Court, allowing a continuance.

*105 It follows, there is no error in the order of the Superior Court, dismissing the appeal. After which, that Court could have nothing more to do with the case, and a procedendo properly issued.

Per Curiam,

Judgment affirmed-.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 N.C. 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-schimmerhorn-nc-1860.