Williams v.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided March 10, 2021·No. 2019-001058·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of James Williams, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-001058

Appeal From Lancaster County Brian M. Gibbons, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-082 Submitted February 1, 2021 – Filed March 10, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for the State of South Carolina.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and In re the Care & Treatment of McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 602 S.E.2d 58 (2004). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. APPEAL DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v., (S.C. Ct. App. 2021).

Williams v. (Williams v.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In Re the Care & Treatment of McCoy
602 S.E.2d 58 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2004)