Williams v. Sabo
This text of 487 F. App'x 108 (Williams v. Sabo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Irma Williams appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to substitute the United States as the party Defendant and dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Sabo, 2012 WL 1432447 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
487 F. App'x 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-sabo-ca4-2012.