Williams v. Rudd-Nilsen Co.
176 A.D. 889, 162 N.Y.S. 1149, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9399
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1916
StatusPublished
This text of 176 A.D. 889 (Williams v. Rudd-Nilsen Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Williams v. Rudd-Nilsen Co., 176 A.D. 889, 162 N.Y.S. 1149, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9399 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. We find no evidence that the defendant, appellant, neglected any duty it owed to this plaintiff. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
176 A.D. 889, 162 N.Y.S. 1149, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-rudd-nilsen-co-nyappdiv-1916.