Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Williams v. Rome Railway & Light Co.

Williams v. Rome Railway & Light Co.

61 S.E. 495, 4 Ga. App. 370, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 300
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 18, 1908
Docket1073
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 61 S.E. 495 (Williams v. Rome Railway & Light Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Rome Railway & Light Co., 61 S.E. 495, 4 Ga. App. 370, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 300 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Russell, J.

It was error to dismiss the petition on general demurrer. However, the plaintiff, under his allegations, is entitled to nominal damages only. Glenn v. W. U. Tel. Co., 1 Ga. App. 831 (58 S. E. 83) ; Williamson v. Central Ry. Co., 127 Ga. 125 (56 S. E. 119) ; Lilly v. Boyd, 72 Ga. 83, (1) ; Kenny v. Collier, 79 Ga. 743 (8 S. E. 58).

Judgment reversed.

M. B. Eubanks, W. B. Mebane, for plaintiff,

cited Williamson v. Central Ry. Co., 127 Ga. 125 (1).

Dean & Dean, for defendant,

cited Civil Code, §3802, and the Williamson case, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. Browning
24 S.E.2d 392 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Webb v. Pullman Co.
196 S.E. 477 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Savannah Electric Co. v. Badenhoop
65 S.E. 50 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 S.E. 495, 4 Ga. App. 370, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-rome-railway-light-co-gactapp-1908.