Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Williams v. Rome Railway & Light Co.

Williams v. Rome Railway & Light Co.

61 S.E. 495, 4 Ga. App. 370, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 300
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 18, 1908·No. 1073·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Russell, J.

It was error to dismiss the petition on general demurrer. However, the plaintiff, under his allegations, is entitled to nominal damages only. Glenn v. W. U. Tel. Co., 1 Ga. App. 831 (58 S. E. 83) ; Williamson v. Central Ry. Co., 127 Ga. 125 (56 S. E. 119) ; Lilly v. Boyd, 72 Ga. 83, (1) ; Kenny v. Collier, 79 Ga. 743 (8 S. E. 58).

Judgment reversed.

M. B. Eubanks, W. B. Mebane, for plaintiff,

cited Williamson v. Central Ry. Co., 127 Ga. 125 (1).

Dean & Dean, for defendant,

cited Civil Code, §3802, and the Williamson case, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Rome Railway & Light Co., 61 S.E. 495, 4 Ga. App. 370, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 300 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

61 S.E. 495 (Williams v. Rome Railway & Light Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. Browning
24 S.E.2d 392 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Webb v. Pullman Co.
196 S.E. 477 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Savannah Electric Co. v. Badenhoop
65 S.E. 50 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)