Williams v. Rogers
This text of 80 A.D.2d 913 (Williams v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In consolidated ■ negligence actions, one to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the other to recover damages for injury to property, defendant Rogers appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, dated July 12, 1980 and entered in Dutchess County, which denied his motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The demonstrated existence of triable issues of fact regarding the reliability of the moving defendant renders the denial of his motion for summary judgment justified. Rabin, J.P., Gulotta, Weinstein and Thompson, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 A.D.2d 913, 440 N.Y.S.2d 549, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-rogers-nyappdiv-1981.