Williams v. Robbins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Williams v. Robbins

223 N.C. 658

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 1, 1943·Published

Opinion

Winborne, J.

Plaintiffs present on this appeal these two questions: 1. Are plaintiffs entitled to have the action heard in the courts of Moore County? 2. Should the temporary restraining order and injunction issued be continued to the hearing? For reasons set out in the opinion in Hunsucker v. Winborne, ante, 650, each of these questions must be answered in the negative. Hence, the judgment below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winborne, J.

Plaintiffs present on this appeal these two questions: 1. Are plaintiffs entitled to have the action heard in the courts of Moore County? 2. Should the temporary restraining order and injunction issued be continued to the hearing? For reasons set out in the opinion in Hunsucker v. Winborne, ante, 650, each of these questions must be answered in the negative. Hence, the judgment below is

Affirmed.

Williams v. Robbins, 223 N.C. 658 (N.C. 1943).

Pincite

223 N.C. 658 (Williams v. Robbins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.