Williams v. Richmond Circuit Court

560 F. App'x 169
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 7, 2014
DocketNos. 13-7214, 13-7671
StatusPublished

This text of 560 F. App'x 169 (Williams v. Richmond Circuit Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Richmond Circuit Court, 560 F. App'x 169 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

[170]*170Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Buterra Williams appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) and 60(b) motions to reconsider the district court’s prior order remanding his state prosecution to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
560 F. App'x 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-richmond-circuit-court-ca4-2014.