Williams v. Richmond Circuit Court
This text of 560 F. App'x 169 (Williams v. Richmond Circuit Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[170]*170Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Gary Buterra Williams appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) and 60(b) motions to reconsider the district court’s prior order remanding his state prosecution to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
560 F. App'x 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-richmond-circuit-court-ca4-2014.