Williams v. Richmond Circuit Court

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. Richmond Circuit Court

560 F. App'x 169

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 7, 2014·No. Nos. 13-7214, 13-7671·Published

Opinion

[170] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Buterra Williams appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) and 60(b) motions to reconsider the district court’s prior order remanding his state prosecution to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[170] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Buterra Williams appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) and 60(b) motions to reconsider the district court’s prior order remanding his state prosecution to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Williams v. Richmond Circuit Court, 560 F. App'x 169 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

560 F. App'x 169 (Williams v. Richmond Circuit Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.