Williams v. Richards

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 9, 2003
Docket96-10378
StatusUnpublished

This text of Williams v. Richards (Williams v. Richards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Richards, (5th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10378 Summary Calendar

BILLY WAYNE WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ANN RICHARDS, also known as Governor of Texas; ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:93-CV-359 - - - - - - - - - - May 21, 1997 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Texas prisoner Billy Wayne Williams, No. 365918, has moved

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) to appeal the

district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint. The

Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) applies to this appeal. See

Strickland v. Rankin County Correctional Facility, 105 F.3d 972,

973-76 (5th Cir. 1997). Williams has complied with the

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-10378 - 2 -

certification requirements of the PLRA and his motion for leave

to proceed IFP is GRANTED.

IT IS ORDERED that Williams authorize the appropriate prison

authorities to withdraw the initial partial filing fee of $7.85

from his trust fund account in accordance with the procedures

required by the prison and to forward payment of the initial

partial filing fee to the Clerk of the U.S. District Court for

the Northern District of Texas.

Thereafter, Williams shall make periodic payments to the

clerk of the same district court until the full appellate filing

fee of $105 is paid.

To accomplish these periodic payments, Williams is directed

to execute all consents and forms required by the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, to

authorize the withdrawals from his trust fund account.

In accordance with its standard procedure, the prison having

custody of Williams is directed to periodically forward payments

from his prisoner account to the clerk of the district court each

time the amount in his account exceeds $10.

Williams contends that the district court erred in

dismissing his complaint. We have carefully reviewed the record

and the briefs and AFFIRM for the reasons adopted by the district

court. See Williams v. Richards, No. 2:93-CV-0359 (N.D. Tex.

Mar. 11, 1996 and March 29, 1996).

IFP GRANTED; INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE ASSESSED; JUDGMENT No. 96-10378 - 3 -

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Rankin County Correctional Facility
105 F.3d 972 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Williams v. Richards, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-richards-ca5-2003.