Williams v. Renwick

52 Ark. 160
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per, Curiam :

Pleading. The answer did not allege want of jurisdiction of the person or subject matter of the controversy, but only error in the exercise of jurisdiction, if error at all. We cannot inquire into that subject. The demurrer was rightly sustained.

Affirmed.

Battle, J., did not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Renwick, 52 Ark. 160 (Ark. 1889).

52 Ark. 160 (Williams v. Renwick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beauchamp v. Bertig
119 S.W. 75 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1909)
Hall v. Melvin
35 S.W. 1109 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1896)