Williams v. Reid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams v. Reid

120 A.D.2d 740, 502 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56866

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D.2d 740 (Williams v. Reid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Reid, 120 A.D.2d 740, 502 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondent to correctly compute his Parole Board appearance date, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.), dated March 6, 1985, as failed to assign counsel to him.

Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Should the petitioner commence an administrative appeal to the Parole Board and be financially unable to provide for his own attorney in connection with that appeal, he may apply at that time for the appointment of counsel (see, Executive Law § 259-i [4] [b]). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondent to correctly compute his Parole Board appearance date, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.), dated March 6, 1985, as failed to assign counsel to him.

Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Should the petitioner commence an administrative appeal to the Parole Board and be financially unable to provide for his own attorney in connection with that appeal, he may apply at that time for the appointment of counsel (see, Executive Law § 259-i [4] [b]). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D.2d 740, 502 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-reid-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack