Williams v. Read

261 N.E.2d 399, 27 N.Y.2d 577, 313 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1324
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 13, 1970
StatusPublished

This text of 261 N.E.2d 399 (Williams v. Read) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Read, 261 N.E.2d 399, 27 N.Y.2d 577, 313 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1324 (N.Y. 1970).

Opinion

Order reversed, without costs, and. matter remitted to Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Neither Special Term nor the Appellate Division had the power to determine petitioner’s right to sick leave on the basis of proof never presented to the .Superintendent of Schools and on which he never had the opportunity to pass. The [580]*580responsibility to make the determination, in any event, was solely that of the Superintendent. Consequently matter should be remitted to the Superintendent for reconsideration de novo.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 N.E.2d 399, 27 N.Y.2d 577, 313 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-read-ny-1970.