Williams v. Rashid

Opinion

ANGELA WILLIAMS, et al., Case No.: 2:21-cv-01676-APG-MDC 4 Plaintiff Order v. 6], JAMAL RASHID, et al., 7 Defendants 8 I hereby certify that the appeal filed in this matter by defendants SHAC, LLC and SHAC MT, LLC is frivolous. See Chuman v. Wright, 960 F.2d 104, 105 (9th Cir. 1992). I will retain 10}| jurisdiction over the claims against SHAC, LLC and SHAC MT, LLC and proceed with 11}| discovery towards trial. The motion to stay pending appeal (ECF No. 306) is denied. 12 DATED this 26th day of August, 2025. 13 ANDREW P. GORDON 15 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23