Williams v. Raines

67 S.E.2d 343, 234 N.C. 452, 1951 N.C. LEXIS 476
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 7, 1951·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

All of plaintiff’s assignments of error, save one, are bottomed on exceptions to the charge of the court on the first issue. As the verdict on that issue was in favor of plaintiff, any error in the charge of the court in respect thereto is harmless and affords no cause for a new trial.

The lone exception to the charge on the second issue is directed to the statement of a contention. It does not appear that this exception was entered in apt time. In any event, we are unable to perceive that plaintiff was prejudiced thereby.

[453] Tbe jury, in a trial free from error on the second issue, has resolved the question of contributory negligence against the plaintiff. He must abide the result.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Raines, 67 S.E.2d 343, 234 N.C. 452, 1951 N.C. LEXIS 476 (N.C. 1951).

67 S.E.2d 343 (Williams v. Raines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McLean v. McLean
74 S.E.2d 320 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Anderson v. Talman Office Supplies, Inc.
73 S.E.2d 141 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)