Williams v. Potash Corp

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 2, 2001·No. 99-5079·Published

Opinion

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH 

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS

81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

s '28*/$6 &$03%(// ;  3(7(5 + .(66(5   DQG$/)5(' /   1RV :,//,$06 s5     3ODLQWLIIV$SSHOOHHV !   Y   327$6+ &25325$7,21 2)  6$6.$7&+(:$1 ,1& D   6DVNDWFKHZDQ&RUSRUDWLRQ  'HIHQGDQW$SSHOODQW  1 $SSHDOIURPWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUW IRUWKH:HVWHUQ'LVWULFWRI7HQQHVVHHDW0HPSKLV 1RVnsRQ3KLSSV 0F&DOOD'LVWULFWsXGJH $UJXHG0DUFK 'HFLGHGDQG)LOHG)HEUXDU\ %HIRUH1(/621%2**6DQG1255,6&LUFXLWsXGJHV

  &DPSEHOOHWDO 1RV 1RV &DPSEHOOHWDO  Y3RWDVK&RUS Y3RWDVK&RUS

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB UHVWULFWHGVWRFNULJKWVWKDW3&6DUJXHVGLGQRWYHVWXQWLO FRXOGDQGVKRXOGVWLOOEHLQFOXGHGLQWKHVHYHUDQFHSDFNDJH &2816(/ FDOFXODWLRQV $5*8('5REHUW+.ORQRIIs21(6'$<5($9,6 2WKHU WKDQ WKHVH IHZ FRUUHFWLRQV ZH DJUHH ZLWK WKH 32*8( :DVKLQJWRQ '& IRU $SSHOODQW  5LFKDUG / FDOFXODWLRQVDVIRXQGE\WKHGLVWULFWFRXUW )HQWRQ 6211(16&+(,1 1$7+  526(17+$/ &KLFDJR ,OOLQRLV IRU $SSHOOHHV  21 %5,()  5REHUW + 9, .ORQRII 'DQLHO + %URPEHUJ s21(6 '$< 5($9,6 32*8( :DVKLQJWRQ '& %UXFH 6 .UDPHU sHII 6PLWK 3&6KDVDOUHDG\UHFHLYHGWKHEHQHILWRIWKHEDUJDLQLWVWUXFN %252' .5$0(50HPSKLV7HQQHVVHHIRU$SSHOODQW FRQFHUQLQJJROGHQSDUDFKXWHV LQKDYLQJDQRUGHUO\FKDQJHLQ 5LFKDUG / )HQWRQ /RUL $QQH :DUG 6211(16&+(,1 FRUSRUDWH FRQWURO DQG LQ LQVXULQJ $UFDGLDQjV KHDOWK LQ WKH 1$7+ 526(17+$/&KLFDJR,OOLQRLVIRU$SSHOOHHV HYHQWRIDIDLOHGHIIRUWWRPHUJH DQGLWFDQQRWQRZUHIXVH SD\PHQW LQ UHWXUQ  7KHUH ZDV FRQVLGHUDWLRQ IRU WKH BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB DVVXPSWLRQ DJUHHPHQW LQVRIDU DV LW ZDV ERXQG XS LQ WKH PHUJHUREOLJDWLRQV*ROGHQSDUDFKXWHVDUHQRWYRLGDVDJDLQVW 23,1,21 SXEOLF SROLF\ QRU GLG WKH $UFDGLDQ ERDUG H[KLELW JURVV BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB QHJOLJHQFHLQDSSURYLQJWKHJROGHQSDUDFKXWHVDWLVVXHLQWKLV FDVH)LQDOO\DOWKRXJKWKHGLVWULFWFRXUWFRUUHFWO\LQWHUSUHWHG %2**6 &LUFXLW sXGJH  7KH 3RWDVK &RUSRUDWLRQ RI WKHPXOWLSOLHUFODXVHjVODQJXDJHEDVHGRQH[WULQVLFHYLGHQFH 6DVNDWFKHZDQ,QF m3&6l DSSHDOVIURPWKHGLVWULFWFRXUWjV JDWKHUHGDWWULDOLWFRPPLWWHGFOHDUHUURULQFRXQWLQJFHUWDLQ SDUWLDOJUDQWRIVXPPDU\MXGJPHQWDQGLWVMXGJPHQWDIWHUWULDO LQFHQWLYHSD\PHQWVWKDWZHUHPDGHLQUHVSHFWRIPRUHWKDQ LQIDYRURISODLQWLIIVDSSHOOHHVs'&DPSEHOO3HWHU.HVVHU WZR \HDUV  )RU WKHVH UHDVRQV WKH MXGJPHQW RI WKH GLVWULFW DQG $OIUHG :LOOLDPV s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j HPSOR\PHQW DJUHHPHQWV E\WKHFKDQJHLQFRUSRUDWHFRQWURORI$UFDGLDQ DQGDGGLWLRQDOmJRRGFDXVHl

 7KLV RSLQLRQ ZLOO IROORZ WKH GLVWULFW FRXUW LQ XVLQJ WKH WHUPV mHPSOR\PHQW DJUHHPHQWVl DQG mVHYHUDQFH DJUHHPHQWVl LQWHUFKDQJHDEO\ WR UHIHU WR WKH H[HFXWLYHVj DJUHHPHQW ZLWK $UFDGLDQ  &DPSEHOOHWDO 1RV 1RV &DPSEHOOHWDO  Y3RWDVK&RUS Y3RWDVK&RUS

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Potash Corp, (6th Cir. 2001).

Williams v. Potash Corp (Williams v. Potash Corp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.