Williams v. PINGELTON

Missouri Court of Appeals

Williams v. PINGELTON

273 S.W.3d 48, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1445, 2008 WL 4621298

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 21, 2008·No. WD 69408·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stanley Williams appeals the order of the trial court denying his motion to set aside a default judgment entered against him in his legal malpractice action. On appeal, Williams claims that the trial court erred in denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum and in denying his motion to set aside the default judgment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The • judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stanley Williams appeals the order of the trial court denying his motion to set aside a default judgment entered against him in his legal malpractice action. On appeal, Williams claims that the trial court erred in denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum and in denying his motion to set aside the default judgment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The • judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Williams v. PINGELTON, 273 S.W.3d 48, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1445, 2008 WL 4621298 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

273 S.W.3d 48 (Williams v. PINGELTON) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.