WILLIAMS v. PHILADELPHIA WATER DEPARTMENT

E.D. Pennsylvania

WILLIAMS v. PHILADELPHIA WATER DEPARTMENT

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided August 8, 2023·No. 2:23-cv-01728·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

VALERY WILLIAMS, : Plaintiff : CIVIL ACTION vy. : PHILADELPHIA WATER : DEPARTMENT, : No. 23-1728 Defendant : fe , ORDER AND NOW, this /: day of August, 2023, upon consideration of Defendant City of Philadelphia’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 6) and Plaintiff Valery Williams’s Responses (Doc. Nos. 7, 8), itis hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The City of Phitadelphia’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 6) is GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum. 2. If Ms. Williams seeks ieave to amend her complaint, she must FILE a motion seeking leave to file an amended complaint within 60 days of this Order; after 60 days, this case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute.! BY THY COURT:

. U EE. PRATTER UNITED STATES District JUDGE

| “[T]o request leave to amend a compliant, the plaintiff must submit a draft amended complaint to the court so that it can determine whether amendment would be futile.” Fletcher-Harlee Corp. v. Pote Concrete Contractors, inc., 482 F.3d 247, 252 (3d Cir. 2007).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

VALERY WILLIAMS, : Plaintiff : CIVIL ACTION vy. : PHILADELPHIA WATER : DEPARTMENT, : No. 23-1728 Defendant : fe , ORDER AND NOW, this /: day of August, 2023, upon consideration of Defendant City of Philadelphia’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 6) and Plaintiff Valery Williams’s Responses (Doc. Nos. 7, 8), itis hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The City of Phitadelphia’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 6) is GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum. 2. If Ms. Williams seeks ieave to amend her complaint, she must FILE a motion seeking leave to file an amended complaint within 60 days of this Order; after 60 days, this case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute.! BY THY COURT:

. U EE. PRATTER UNITED STATES District JUDGE

| “[T]o request leave to amend a compliant, the plaintiff must submit a draft amended complaint to the court so that it can determine whether amendment would be futile.” Fletcher-Harlee Corp. v. Pote Concrete Contractors, inc., 482 F.3d 247, 252 (3d Cir. 2007).

WILLIAMS v. PHILADELPHIA WATER DEPARTMENT, (E.D. Pa. 2023).

Pincite

WILLIAMS v. PHILADELPHIA WATER DEPARTMENT (WILLIAMS v. PHILADELPHIA WATER DEPARTMENT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related